
中国科学院微生物研究所,中国微生物学会,中国菌物学会
文章信息
- Yinze HAN, Hailong GAO, Jinzhi XU, Jian LUO, Jiajing CHEN, Bing HAN, Tian LI, Zeyang ZHOU. 2022
- 韩尹泽, 郜海龙, 徐金智, 罗堿, 陈佳靖, 韩冰, 李田, 周泽扬. 2022
- Microsporidian Encephalitozoon hellem secretes EhPTP4 to regulate host endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation
- 海伦脑炎微孢子虫分泌蛋白EhPTP4对宿主内质网蛋白降解通路的调控作用
- Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 62(1): 357-373
- 微生物学报, 62(1): 357-373
-
文章历史
- 收稿日期:2020-05-04
- 修回日期:2021-07-29
- 网络出版日期:2021-08-09
2. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Microsporidia Infection and Control, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China;
3. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China;
4. College of Life Science, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 400047, China
2. 西南大学微孢子虫感染与防控重庆市重点实验室, 重庆 400715;
3. 山东大学基础医学院, 山东 济南 250100;
4. 重庆师范大学生命科学学院, 重庆 400047
Microsporidia are a group of obligate intracellular parasites with a broad range of hosts from invertebrates to vertebrates, including humans. More than 200 genera and 1 400 species of microsporidia have been identified[1]. Encephalitozoon is recognized as a common mammal-infecting species[1-2] that causes comprehensive immune responses[3]. Having emerged as important opportunistic pathogens in humans, microsporidia have been identified in patients infected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), organ transplant recipients, aged individuals and children[4-7]. Microsporidia have undergone extreme genomic compaction and reduction and lost canonical mitochondria and the genes for many metabolic pathways, such as the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and the de novo synthesis of nucleotides and amino acids[8-10]. Instead, microsporidia evolved strategies to manipulate pathways and rely on host nutrients, as well as escape host immunity[3, 11].
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a key organelle that functions in protein synthesis and processing, lipid synthesis, and calcium (Ca2+) homeostasis[12]. Misfolded and misassembled proteins are degraded by the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) pathway, which includes a series of tightly coupled steps: substrate recognition, dislocation, and ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal destruction[13-17]. Thus, ERAD maintains protein quality by degrading proteins that fail to attain their native conformation due to mutations, errors in transcription or translation, or inefficient assembly into their native oligomeric complexes. ERAD has also been found to play important roles during pathogen infection. Certain types of pathogens, such as viruses, bacteria and protozoa, preferably hijack the host ERAD machinery to support their requirements[18-21], which generally includes the following three steps. First, proteolytic secretory and membrane proteins involved in the immune response, including major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class Ⅰ and CD4, are exploited by pathogens to evade host immunity[22-23]. Second, ERAD is hijacked as transportation machinery from the ER to the cytosol for the invasion of pathogens[24]. Third, ERAD is utilized by pathogens to favor their nutritional requirements for virulence[25].
To subvert and manipulate host pathways, pathogens usually secrete proteins as virulent factors into host organelles[26-30]. For example, pathogen proteins secreted into the host nucleus play important roles in regulating immunity, proliferation and apoptosis[31-33]. Here, for the first time, we report that the polar tube protein 4 of E. hellem (EhPTP4)[34] is a secretory protein targeting host nucleus to disturb the ERAD pathway and protein degradation.
1 Materials and Methods 1.1 Cell culturesRabbit kidney cells (RK13, ATCC CCL37, Shangcheng Beina Chuanglian Biotechnology Co. Ltd) were cultured in minimum essential medium (MEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin-streptomycin (100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin) in an incubator with 5% CO2. Human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293, ATCC CRL-1573, Fudan IBS Cell Center) and human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF, ATCC CRL-2522, Shangcheng Beina Chuanglian Biotechnology Co. Ltd) were grown in 10% FBS-containing Dulbecco's modified MEM with penicillin-streptomycin in an incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 ℃.
1.2 Preparation of E. hellem sporesMonolayer RK13 cells were infected with E. hellem spores and maintained in MEM with penicillin-streptomycin supplemented with 10% FBS. Spores were collected from the culture medium, purified with 75% Percoll by centrifugation at 1 000 r/min for 10 min, and washed three times with sterile distilled water by centrifugation at 1 000 r/min for 5 min. The purified spores were then counted and stored in sterile distilled water at 4 ℃.
1.3 Preparation of recombinant EhPTP4 and antiserumThe coding sequence (CDS) of EhPTP4 was amplified from E. hellem genomic DNA (gDNA) using PrimeSTAR Max Premix DNA polymerase with the forward primer 5′-CCATGGCTGATATC GGATCCGAATTCATGTCAACGTTTGTGGGTGC-3′ and the reverse primer 5′-GTGCTCGAGT GCGGCCGCAAGCTTTCTTTATAGACGGTAAGTGC-3′. The PCR products were inserted into the pET32a (+) vector, which contains a hexa-histidine tag (His), using homologous recombinase (Yeasen) according to the instruction manual. The recombinant plasmid pET32-EhPTP4-6×His was verified by sequencing. Escherichia coli Transetta (DE3) cells were transformed with the plasmid and cultured at 37 ℃ overnight in 5 mL of Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (10% tryptone, 5% yeast extract, 10% sodium chloride) with 100 μg/mL ampicillin, inoculated into 400 mL of LB medium and cultured to an OD600=0.6. EhPTP4 was then induced for 20 h at 16 ℃ by the addition of 0.5 mmol/L isopropyl-D-thiogalactoside to the culture medium. Subsequently, the bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation for 15 min at 5 000 r/min, resuspended in 20 mL of buffer A (100 mmol/L sodium chloride, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 8 mol/L urea, pH 8.0), lysed by sonication on ice and centrifuged at 1 000 ×g and 4 ℃ for 1 hour to harvest the lysate. The supernatant was loaded onto a Ni-NTA Superflow cartridge (Qiagen) and eluted with buffer B (100 mmol/L sodium chloride, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 8 mol/L urea, 250 mmol/L imidazole). Polyclonal antiserum against EhPTP4 (anti-EhPTP4) was prepared by intradermally inoculating mice with purified rEhPTP4 (100 μg/mouse).
HFF cells infected with E. hellem spores for 5 d were harvested to extract nuclear proteins using the Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Protein Extraction Kit (Beyotime). The extracted proteins were boiled at 100 ℃ upon the addition of protein loading buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. The membranes were blocked with western blocking buffer [2 g of skim milk in 40 mL of Tris-buffered saline supplemented with 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST)] for 2 h at room temperature (RT). Then, the membranes were incubated with anti-EhPTP4 diluted 1:150 in blocking buffer for 2 h at RT and washed three times with TBST. The blots were then incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to HRP. After three washes, the membranes were exposed with an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western blotting detection kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and imaged with an Azure Biosystems C300 imaging system.
1.4 EhPTP4 transfection of HEK293 cellsThe CDSs for EhPTP4, EhPTP4Δ1-16, EhPTP4Δ239-278 and EhPTP4ΔHRD were amplified from E. hellem gDNA with specific primers (Table 1). DNA fragments conjugated to an HA tag and EGFP were inserted into the pcDNA3.0 plasmid and transformed into E. coli DH5α for replication. The replicated plasmid DNA was extracted using an Endofree Minimal Plasmid Kit Ⅱ (Tiangen) and transfected into HEK293 cells using a Lipofectamine 3000 kit (Invitrogen). After 48 h, the transfected cells were harvested to analyze protein expression and subcellular localization.
Genes | Forward primers | Reverse primers |
EhPTP4 | CACTATAGGGAGACCCATGGAACTGGGTTTGATCTTG | GAACATCGTATGGGTAGAAAACTATGGGCTCTCTTCC |
EhPTP4Δ1-16 | ACTCACTATAGGGAGACCCATGAAGGACAGGGAGCTGG | ATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTAGAAAACTATGGGCTCTC |
EhPTP4Δ239-278 | CACTATAGGGAGACCCATGGAACTGGGTTTGATCTTG | ATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTAAACCACCCTTCTTTCG |
EH7108ΔHRD | CACTATAGGGAGACCCATGGAACTGGGTTTGATCTTG | ATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTACTCAACGTAGGTTCTCCT |
1.5 Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA)
Infected HEK293 cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, washed three times with PBS, and permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 min. The cells were then blocked in PBST containing 10% goat serum and 5% BSA for 1 h at 37 ℃ and washed three times with PBS. Samples were incubated with anti-EhPTP4 (diluted 1:150 in blocking buffer) or negative serum (diluted 1:150 in blocking buffer) for 1 h at RT, washed three times, and then incubated with secondary anti-mouse IgG conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (diluted 1:1 000 in PBS) for 1 h. Both host cells and pathogenic nuclei were stained with 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 30 min at RT and washed three times. The samples were observed and photographed using an Olympus FV1200 laser scanning confocal microscope.
1.6 RNA-seq analysis of EhPTP4-transfected HEK293 cellsThe transcriptomic responses of HEK293 cells transfected with HA-EGFP and EhPTP4-HA-EGFP were investigated with RNA-seq, with three replicates of each group. RNA samples were extracted and assessed using a Nanodrop 2 100 and Agilent 2 000 system. Libraries were constructed and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq platform. Clean sequencing reads were mapped to the human genome (ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-95/) using HISAT2[35] and assembled with StringTie[36]. Fragments per kilobase per million (FPKM) values were calculated and used to compare gene expression levels. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the EhPTP4-HA-EGFP- and HA-EGFP-transfected cells were analyzed using DEseq2[37]. The DEGs were filtered with the thresholds of a P < 0.01 and a fold change≥2, and DEGs found in at least in two replicates were considered credible. KEGG enrichment analysis of the DEGs was performed using clusterProfiler[38], which is an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Pathways enriched in at least two genes and a P < 0.05 were considered significant.
1.7 Real time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)Total RNA was extracted from RK13 cells transfected with EhPTP4 using the E.Z.N.A.® Total RNA Kit II (OMEGA, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was synthesized with 1 μg of total RNA using the Hifair® III 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (gDNA digester plus) (Yeasen). RT-qPCR was performed using the primers for candidate genes shown in Table 2. The transcription level was elevated by the 2-ΔΔCt values with three replicates. All statistical t-tests were conducted using GraphPad Prism 6.0 for two-tailed comparison tests, the results of which with a P < 0.05 were considered significant.
Genes | Forward primers | Reverse primers |
EhPTP4 | TTACAAAGGGACCTGATGAAACC | CTTCTTCATAGGAGGAGCATTCA |
Eh-βtubulin | TGAAGATGAGCAATCCAGGGTA | TAGCAATCAGGGGTGCAAAT |
GADPH | GTATCGTGGAAGGACTCATGAC | ACCACCTTCTTGATGTCATCAT |
PDIA4 | CGTTGATTACATGATCGAGCAG | ATTTCTCAGGCTGCATTACAAC |
HSPA5 | GCTCTCTGGTGATCAAGATACA | GTTCCTTGGAATCAGTTTGGTC |
HERP | TTGGTTGGATTGGACCTATTCA | GTCTAAATGGAAACCACCCAAC |
To assess the growth of E. hellem in cell culture, quantitative PCR was performed with β-tubulin primers (F: TGAAGATGAGCAATC CAGGGTA, R: TAGCAATCAGGGGTGCAAAT). The gDNA of EhPTP4- and EGFP-transfected HEK293 cells infected with E. hellem was extracted using an E.Z.N.A.™ Tissue DNA kit (OMEGA, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
1.8 Western blotting analysis of protein expression and ubiquitinationProteins of HEK293 cells transfected with HA-EGFP and EhPTP4-HA-EGFP for 48 h were extracted using cell lysis buffer for Western blotting and IP (Beyotime, China, P0013) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (MedChemExpress, China, HY-K0010) and DUB inhibitor (Beyotime, China, SG0020). Western blotting was performed with mouse monoclonal antibody against actin (Beyotime, China, AA128), rabbit monoclonal antibody against HERP (Abcam, UK, ab150424), rabbit monoclonal antibody against PDIA4 (Abcam, UK, ab190348), mouse monoclonal antibody against EGFP (Roche, Switzerland, Cat. No. 11814460001), rabbit polyclonal antibody against HSPA5 (Beyotime, China, AF0171), mouse monoclonal antibody against FLAG (Sigma-Aldrich, USA, F3165) and anti-ubiquitin rabbit pAb (NT) (PTM Bio, China, PTM1106) to analyze protein expression and ubiquitination, respectively.
2 Results 2.1 Sequence features of EhPTP4EhPTP4, which locus name is EHEL_071080 (GenBank accession: XP_003887615), was annotated as a hypothetical protein and is composed of 278 amino acids. Predictions with SignalP 5.0[39] and NLS Mapper[40] showed that EhPTP4 contains a signal peptide (SP) from amino acids 1 to 17 and a nuclear localization signal sequence (NLS) from amino acids 239 to 249, respectively, indicating that EhPTP4 is a secreted protein that probably targets the host nucleus (Figure 1). In addition, the C-terminal region of EhPTP4 encodes a histidine-rich domain (HRD) from the 258th to 265th amino acids, which was suggested to be functional in transcriptional regulation in the nucleus. Multiple sequence alignment analysis demonstrated that EhPTP4 is highly conserved with homologs among Encephalitozoon species (E. hellem, E. romaleae, E. cuniculi and E. intestinalis), suggesting important functions of this protein in Encephalitozoon.
![]() |
Figure 1 Sequence features and multiple alignment of EhPTP4. Protein sequences of EhPTP4 (XP_003887615) and homologs in E. romaleae (XP_009264853), E. cuniculi (NP_586038) and E. intestinalis (XP_003073228) were aligned using MAFFT. EhPTP4 encodes 278 amino acids containing a signal peptide from 1 to 17, a nuclear localization signal sequence (NLS) from 239 to 249, and a histidine-rich domain (HRD) from 258 to 265. |
2.2 The expression profile and subcellular localization of EhPTP4
To characterize the subcellular localization of EhPTP4 in infected cells, recombinant EhPTP4 was expressed in E. coli and purified for the immunization of mice and production of a mouse polyclonal antibody (anti-EhPTP4) (Figure 2, Figure 3A), which was then used to examine the localization of EhPTP4-infected cells using IFA. EhPTP4 was found to translocate into the nuclei of infected cells (Figure 3B), suggesting that EhPTP4 is a secreted protein targeting the host nucleus. Moreover, EhPTP4 was detected in meronts inside parasitophorous vacuoles (PVs), indicating that this protein is mainly synthesized and secreted by meronts and likely plays important roles during proliferation (Figure 3B).
![]() |
Figure 2 Purification and examination of recombinant EhPTP4. A: affinity purification of rEhPTP4-His (arrowhead) with Ni-NTA columns; B: the purified rEhPTP4-His was detected using Western blotting with antibody against His-tag (anti-His tag). |
![]() |
Figure 3 EhPTP4 was secreted from E. hellem-infected cells and translocated to the host nucleus. A: Western blotting analysis of EhPTP4 in the total proteins of EhPTP4-HA-EGFP-transfected cells and E. hellem spores; B: subcellular localization analysis of EhPTP4 in HFF cells infected with E. hellem at 48 hpi with anti-EhPTP4 (green). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). N: nucleus; PV: parasitophorous vacuole; arrowhead: E. hellem meront. Scale bar, 10 μm. |
2.3 The NLS is required for the translocation of EhPTP4 into the host nucleus
The NLS is an essential sequence for the targeting of some proteins to the nucleus[41-43]. The predicted NLS of EhPTP4 is probably necessary for nuclear localization. Therefore, EhPTP4 deletion mutants lacking the SP (EhPTP4Δ1-16-HA-EGFP) and NLS (EhPTP4Δ239-278-HA-EGFP) were constructed and expressed in HEK293 cells. As detected by IFA and Western blotting, EhPTP4-HA-EGFP and EhPTP4Δ1-16-HA-EGFP were found in the nucleus (Figure 4, Figure 5), while EhPTP4Δ239-278-HA-EGFP was present in only the cytoplasm (Figure 4), suggesting that the NLS is indispensable for the nuclear targeting of EhPTP4.
![]() |
Figure 4 EhPTP4 translocation to the host nucleus depends on its nuclear localization signal sequence (NLS). A: constructions of EhPTP4 deletion mutants lacking the signal peptide (EhPTP4Δ1-16-HA-EGFP) and NLS (EhPTP4Δ239-278-HA-EGFP); B: the subcellular localization of EhPTP4-HA-EGFP, EhPTP4Δ1-16- HA-EGFP and EhPTP4Δ239-278-HA-EGFP (shown in green) in transfected HEK293 cells was observed using a laser scanning confocal microscope. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). N: nucleus. |
![]() |
Figure 5 Western blotting analysis of the subcellular localization of EhPTP4 in transfected cells. A: the expression of EhPTP4-HA-EGFP and HA-EGFP in HEK293 were detected using anti-EGFP; B: the cytoplasm and nucleus of HEK293 cells transfected with EhPTP4-HA-EGFP and HA-EGFP were extracted, respectively. Each fraction was then detected for EhPTP4 using Western blotting with antibody against EGFP (anti-EGFP), respectively. |
2.4 EhPTP4 promotes E. hellem proliferation
The expression profile of EhPTP4 was investigated in E. hellem-infected HEK293 cells using RT-qPCR. The results showed that EhPTP4 was expressed from 12 h post infection (hpi) and highly expressed from 36 hpi (Figure 6A), at which time the pathogens were at the meront stage. In HEK293 cells transfected with EhPTP4- HA-EGFP and HA-EGFP (control), the pathogen load was determined and indicated by the copy number of E. hellem β-tubulin. The overexpression of EhPTP4 significantly promoted the proliferation of E. hellem (Figure 6B). These results indicate that EhPTP4 is vital to pathogen growth.
![]() |
Figure 6 EhPTP4 overexpression promoted E. hellem proliferation. A: RT-qPCR analysis of EhPTP4 expression in E. hellem-infected RK13 cells from 12 to 72 hpi; B: qPCR analysis of E. hellem proliferation in EhPTP4-HA-EGFP- and HA-EGFP-transfected HEK293 cells. The transfected cells were infected with 1×106 E. hellem spores, and genomic DNA was then extracted. Pathogen load was determined as indicated by quantification of the E. hellem β-tubulin gene. |
2.5 EhPTP4 activates the host ERAD response
Being secreted into the host nucleus, EhPTP4 probably regulates host gene expression. Thus, the gene expression levels of HEK293 cells transfected with EhPTP4-HA-EGFP and HA-EGFP (control) were determined with RNA-seq (Figure 7). As shown by the results, a total of 82 DEGs, including 41 upregulated genes and 41 downregulated genes, were detected (Table 1). KEGG enrichment analysis of the DEGs showed that the ERAD pathway was significantly enriched in the DEGs, including 4 upregulated genes encoding the protein disulfide isomerase family A member 4 (PDIA4), homocysteine-induced endoplasmic reticulum protein (HERP), heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 5 (HSPA5) and degradation in endoplasmic reticulum protein 3 (DERL3), which are vital components in ERAD (Figure 8). The upregulation of these genes was verified by RT-qPCR and Western blotting (Figure 9A, B). These results indicated that EhPTP4 is secreted into the host nucleus and dysregulates the ERAD pathway. ERAD is vital for protein homeostasis due to the degradation of misfolded and unfolded proteins in the ER. In this process, substrate proteins undergo recognition, dislocation, ubiquitination, translocation from the ER, and then degradation by the proteasome. Hence, we checked protein ubiquitination using Western blotting with anti-ubiquitin and found it to be increased in EhPTP4-transfected HEK293 cells (Figure 9C).
![]() |
Figure 7 Preparation of RNA-seq samples. A: basic work flow for preparing of RNA-seq samples; B: HEK293 cells transfected with EhPTP4-HA-EGFP and HA-EGFP were observed using fluorescence microscope. The nucleus was stained with DAPI (blue): C: the transfection rates of HEK293 cells were statistically counted. |
![]() |
Figure 8 KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs between HEK293 cells transfected with EhPTP4-HA-EGFP and HA-EGFP (control). DEGs were statistically determined from RNA-seq data from the transfected cells, and enrichment was assessed by mapping to the KEGG database. The results showed that genes involved in ERAD, including PDIA4, HERP, HSPA5 and DERL3, were significantly enriched and upregulated. |
![]() |
Figure 9 Verification of ERAD genes in HEK293 cells transfected with EhPTP4-HA-EGFP and HA-EGFP (control). A: the expression levels of PDIA4, HERP and HSPA5, which were increased in the RNA-seq data, were verified in the transfected cells using RT-qPCR; B: the expression levels of PDIA4, HERP and HSPA5 in the transfected cells were verified using Western blotting with antibodies against each respective protein. Relative intensity was calculated with ImageJ software; C: protein ubiquitination was promoted in the transfected cells, as detected by Western blotting with an antibody against ubiquitin; D: the expression of PDIA4 was detected in the transfected cells with antibodies against PDIA4, EGFP and actin (control); E: protein ubiquitination was promoted in PDIA4-FLAG-transfected HEK293 cells, as detected with antibodies against FLAG, ubiquitin and actin (control); F: the knockdown of PDIA4 expression with RNAi suppressed the expression of HERP, which is a crucial component of the ERAD pathway. |
Protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), most abundant ER protein, is responsible for the formation, breakage and rearrangement of protein disulfide bonds and also helps with the binding of misfolded proteins for subsequent degradation[44-45]. PDIA4 is one of the largest members of the PDI family and acts as an inducer of the ER stress response by forming a chaperone complex with other proteins that binds unfolded protein substrates[46]. In EhPTP4-transfected HEK293 cells, both PDIA4 expression and protein ubiquitination were increased (Figure 9D and 9E), suggesting that EhPTP4 induces host ERAD via PDIA4. For further validation, HEK293 cells were transfected with PDIA4-FLAG, and protein ubiquitination was found to be increased upon the overexpression of PDIA4 (Figure 9E). Moreover, the knockdown of PDIA4 with RNAi suppressed HERP (Figure 9F), which is also an important component of the ERAD pathway, revealing that PDIA4 is a key factor hijacked by microsporidia to modulate host ERAD via EhPTP4.
2.6 HRD is essential for the regulatory function of EhPTP4The HRD is conserved among homologs of EhPTP4 in Encephalitozoon species, indicating its important function for the protein. The HRD identified in vertebrate cyclin T1 was proven to markedly enhance the binding of positive transcription elongation factors to the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the RPB1 subunit of human RNA polymerase II, leading to the hyperphosphorylation of the CTD, which is essential for transcriptional elongation and mRNA processing[47]. This suggests that the localization of EhPTP4 in the host nucleus probably promotes host gene expression with an HRD-dependent mechanism. Therefore, we constructed EhPTP4ΔHRD-HA-EGFP-transfected HEK293 cells and checked the localization of the mutant and ERAD responses. EhPTP4ΔHRD-HA- EGFP showed markedly increased aggregation and formed significantly larger multimers in the nucleus than EhPTP4-HA-EGFP (Figure 10A). As determined by RT-qPCR, the expression levels of PDIA4, HSPA5 and HERP were not significantly increased in EhPTP4ΔHRD-HA-EGFP- transfected cells (Figure 10B), indicating that the HRD is essential for EhPTP4 in activating host ERAD.
![]() |
Figure 10 The HRD is essential for the regulatory function of EhPTP4. A: deletion of the HRD changed the localization of EhPTP4 in the nucleus. EhPTP4ΔHRD-HA-EGFP aggregated and formed a large multimer, whereas wild-type EhPTP4 was evenly distributed in the nucleus; B: the expression of PDIA4, HERP and HSPA5 was dramatically decreased in EhPTP4ΔHRD-HA-EGFP-transfected HEK293 cells compared with cells expressing EhPTP4-HA-EGFP. |
3 Discussion
ERAD is a principal quality control mechanism responsible for targeting native, misfolded and unfolded proteins for dislocation across the ER membrane and proteasomal degradation and plays vital roles in multiple cellular processes and functions[13, 48]. Thus, by modulating ERAD, pathogens broadly affect host cell physiology. Studies have revealed that some intracellular pathogens, including viruses and bacteria, may dysregulate ERAD to enhance their chances of survival in the host[20, 25, 48]. For example, Orientia tsutsugamushi, an obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen that is auxotrophic for aromatic amino acids and histidine, can induce the host unfolded protein response (UPR) and promote ERAD to seize amino acids during early-stage growth[25]. This implies that microsporidia may obtain host amino acids with the same strategy because these pathogens lost the genes for the de novo synthesis of amino acids. On the other hand, hijacking ERAD for proteolytic suppression of immune proteins is also a strategy for certain pathogens[18]. The observed increases in protein ubiquitination and degradation (Figure 9C) suggest that the dysregulation of ERAD may help with the immune evasion of microsporidia. Therefore, determining the ubiquitylated proteins in transfected cells would help further understanding of the functions and regulation of EhPTP4. The UPR is a cytoprotective process that promotes ERAD[17, 45, 48-49], suggesting that EhPTP4 may promote the ERAD machinery by activating the UPR. Through our RNA-seq data, however, we found no DEGs involved in the UPR (Table 1), indicating that EhPTP4 probably dysregulates ERAD through other pathways.
Our study revealed that EhPTP4 is a secreted protein that targets the host nucleus. The EhPTP4 homolog of E. cuniculi was identified in late sporogonial stages by Brosson et al[50]. Moreover, Han et al revealed that EhPTP4 localizes on the tip of the polar tube and interacts with host transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) on the membrane, demonstrating its important roles during infection[34]. Therefore, EhPTP4 is likely a multifunctional protein that plays roles in mediating invasion of the polar tube and targeting the host nucleus to modulate host gene expression. Both studies provide insights into the new functions of this secreted protein conserved in Encephalitozoon whose functions, however, require in-depth study. It is well known that intracellular pathogens can secretes effectors into host cytosol to mimic the activities of host proteins involved in ubiquitin pathway, for example, the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase[51-52]. Localizing in host nucleus and without sequence features homologous to host ubiquitin system components, however, the EhPTP4 is interesting but poorly understood how to modulate host ubiquitinylation. Regarding the functions of EhPTP4 in the host nucleus, it is necessary to determine how EhPTP4 upregulates ERAD genes, what proteins it interacts with, what proteins are degraded, and what downstream pathways are regulated.
E. hellem was originally isolated from Madin-Darby canine kidney cells inoculated with corneal biopsies and conjunctival scrapings of three AIDS patients with keratoconjunctivitis[53]. E. hellem is mostly reported in birds, but, like many other Encephalitozoon species, can also infect human, monkeys, carnivore and rodents[54]. In research, the most common cell lines used for culturing Encephalitozoon are derived from epithelium or fibroblast tissues from rabbits, mice, monkeys, or humans, for example, the RK13 is often use to multiply these parasites, and the most successful cell modes to study the Encephalitozoon infections are HFF and HEK293[55]. Nonetheless, more cell types need to be investigated and utilized to better understand the infections of these parasites.
In summary, we first characterized a microsporidian protein targeting the host nucleus that upregulates the expression of genes involved in ERAD and subsequently increases protein ubiquitination (Figure 11). This work provides a new viewpoint for an in-depth understanding of the mechanisms with which microsporidia and hosts interact.
![]() |
Figure 11 A schematic showing the model by which E. hellem secretes EhPTP4 to dysregulate host ERAD and protein ubiquitination. During E. hellem proliferation, EhPTP4 is secreted and translocated into the host nucleus. ERAD genes, including PDIA4, HERP, HSPA5 and DERL3, are upregulated, resulting in the degradation of some proteins and facilitating E. hellem proliferation. |
Availability of data and materials
The raw data of our RNA-seq is deposited in NCBI SRA with accession number SAMN18995148 under BioProject PRJNA726947. Competing interests: the authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional file: Table S1. Differentially expressed genes in HEK293 cells upon EhPTP4 transfection.
[1] | Fayer R, Santin-Duran M. Epidemiology of microsporidia in human infections. Microsporidia. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2014: 135-164. |
[2] | Han B, Weiss LM. Microsporidia: obligate intracellular pathogens within the fungal kingdom. Microbiology Spectrum, 2017, 5(2). DOI:10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0018-2016 |
[3] | Han YZ, Gao HL, Xu JZ, Luo J, Han B, Bao JL, Pan GQ, Li T, Zhou ZY. Innate and adaptive immune responses against microsporidia infection in mammals. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2020, 11: 1468. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01468 |
[4] | Ghoyounchi R, Mahami-Oskouei M, Rezamand A, Spotin A, Aminisani N, Nami S, Pirestani M, Berahmat R, Madadi S. Molecular phylodiagnosis of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon intestinalis in children with cancer: microsporidia in malignancies as an emerging opportunistic infection. Acta Parasitologica, 2019, 64(1): 103-111. DOI:10.2478/s11686-018-00012-w |
[5] | Abu-Akkada SS, El Kerdany ED, Mady RF, Diab RG, Khedr GA, Ashmawy KI, Lotfy WM. Encephalitozoon cuniculi infection among immunocompromised and immunocompetent humans in Egypt. Iranian Journal of Parasitology, 2015, 10(4): 561-570. |
[6] | Kicia M, Wesolowska M, Kopacz Z, Jakuszko K, Sak B, Květonová D, Krajewska M, Kváč M. Prevalence and molecular characteristics of urinary and intestinal microsporidia infections in renal transplant recipients. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2016, 22(5): 462. |
[7] | Wang ZD, Liu Q, Liu HH, Li S, Zhang L, Zhao YK, Zhu XQ. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium, microsporidia and Isospora infection in HIV-infected people: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasites & Vectors, 2018, 11(1): 1-19. |
[8] | Corradi N, Pombert JF, Farinelli L, Didier ES, Keeling PJ. The complete sequence of the smallest known nuclear genome from the microsporidian Encephalitozoon intestinalis. Nature Communications, 2010, 1: 77. DOI:10.1038/ncomms1082 |
[9] | Nakjang S, Williams TA, Heinz E, Watson AK, Foster PG, Sendra KM, Heaps SE, Hirt RP, Martin Embley T. Reduction and expansion in microsporidian genome evolution: new insights from comparative genomics. Genome Biology and Evolution, 2013, 5(12): 2285-2303. DOI:10.1093/gbe/evt184 |
[10] | Heinz E, Williams TA, Nakjang S, Noël CJ, Swan DC, Goldberg AV, Harris SR, Weinmaier T, Markert S, Becher D, Bernhardt J, Dagan T, Hacker C, Lucocq JM, Schweder T, Rattei T, Hall N, Hirt RP, Embley TM. The genome of the obligate intracellular parasite Trachipleistophora hominis: new insights into microsporidian genome dynamics and reductive evolution. PLoS Pathogens, 2012, 8(10): e1002979. DOI:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002979 |
[11] | Bernal CE, Zorro MM, Sierra J, Gilchrist K, Botero JH, Baena A, Ramirez-Pineda JR. Encephalitozoon intestinalis inhibits dendritic cell differentiation through an IL-6-dependent mechanism. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 2016, 6: 4. DOI:10.3389/fcimb.2016.00004 |
[12] | Phillips MJ, Voeltz GK. Structure and function of ER membrane contact sites with other organelles. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2016, 17(2): 69-82. DOI:10.1038/nrm.2015.8 |
[13] | Qi L, Tsai B, Arvan P. New insights into the physiological role of endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Trends in Cell Biology, 2017, 27(6): 430-440. DOI:10.1016/j.tcb.2016.12.002 |
[14] | Wu XD, Rapoport TA. Mechanistic insights into ER-associated protein degradation. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 2018, 53: 22-28. DOI:10.1016/j.ceb.2018.04.004 |
[15] | Stevenson J, Huang EY, Olzmann JA. Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation and lipid homeostasis. Annual Review of Nutrition, 2016, 36: 511-542. DOI:10.1146/annurev-nutr-071715-051030 |
[16] | Olzmann JA, Kopito RR, Christianson JC. The mammalian endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation system. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 2013, 5(9): a013185. DOI:10.1101/cshperspect.a013185 |
[17] | Hwang J, Qi L. Quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum: crosstalk between ERAD and UPR pathways. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 2018, 43(8): 593-605. DOI:10.1016/j.tibs.2018.06.005 |
[18] | Morito D, Nagata K. Pathogenic hijacking of ER-associated degradation: is ERAD flexible?. Molecular Cell, 2015, 59(3): 335-344. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.010 |
[19] | Bennett SM, Jiang MX, Imperiale MJ. Role of cell-type-specific endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation in Polyomavirus trafficking. Journal of Virology, 2013, 87(16): 8843-8852. DOI:10.1128/JVI.00664-13 |
[20] | Dupzyk A, Tsai B. How polyomaviruses exploit the ERAD machinery to cause infection. Viruses, 2016, 8(9): 242. DOI:10.3390/v8090242 |
[21] | Tang YW, Zheng MJ, An R, Chen LJ, Gong LL, Cai HJ, Liu K, Yu L, Shen JL, Du J. Proteasomal degradation of T. gondii ROP18 requires Derlin2. Acta Tropica, 2017, 174: 106-113. DOI:10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.06.027 |
[22] | Magadán JG, Pérez-Victoria FJ, Sougrat R, Ye YH, Strebel K, Bonifacino JS. Multilayered mechanism of CD4 downregulation by HIV-1 Vpu involving distinct ER retention and ERAD targeting steps. PLoS Pathogens, 2010, 6(4): e1000869. DOI:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000869 |
[23] | Van Den Boomen DJH, Lehner PJ. Identifying the ERAD ubiquitin E3 ligases for viral and cellular targeting of MHC class I. Molecular Immunology, 2015, 68(2): 106-111. DOI:10.1016/j.molimm.2015.07.005 |
[24] | Geiger R, Andritschke D, Friebe S, Herzog F, Luisoni S, Heger T, Helenius A. BAP31 and BiP are essential for dislocation of SV40 from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol. Nature Cell Biology, 2011, 13(11): 1305-1314. DOI:10.1038/ncb2339 |
[25] | Rodino KG, VieBrock L, Evans SM, Ge H, Richards AL, Carlyon JA. Orientia tsutsugamushi modulates endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation to benefit its growth. Infection and Immunity, 2018, 86(1): e00596-17. |
[26] | Asrat S, de Jesús DA, Hempstead AD, Ramabhadran V, Isberg RR. Bacterial pathogen manipulation of host membrane trafficking. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 2014, 30: 79-109. DOI:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013439 |
[27] | Escoll P, Mondino S, Rolando M, Buchrieser C. Targeting of host organelles by pathogenic bacteria: a sophisticated subversion strategy. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2016, 14(1): 5-19. DOI:10.1038/nrmicro.2015.1 |
[28] | Senderskiy IV, Timofeev SA, Seliverstova EV, Pavlova OA, Dolgikh VV. Secretion of Antonospora (Paranosema) locustae proteins into infected cells suggests an active role of microsporidia in the control of host programs and metabolic processes. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(4): e93585. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0093585 |
[29] | Von Dwingelo J, Chung IYW, Price CT, Li L, Jones S, Cygler M, Abu Kwaik Y. Interaction of the ankyrin H core effector of Legionella with the host LARP7 component of the 7SK snRNP complex. mBio, 2019, 10(4): e01942-19. |
[30] | Bao JL, Liu LL, An YY, Ran MS, Ni WJ, Chen J, Wei JH, Li T, Pan GQ, Zhou ZY. Nosema bombycis suppresses host hemolymph melanization through secreted serpin 6 inhibiting the prophenoloxidase activation cascade. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 2019, 168: 107260. DOI:10.1016/j.jip.2019.107260 |
[31] | Panas MW, Naor A, Cygan AM, Boothroyd JC. Toxoplasma controls host cyclin E expression through the use of a novel MYR1-dependent effector protein, HCE1. bioRxiv, 2019. DOI:10.1101/573618 |
[32] | Wang WJ, Chen JL, Liao BS, Xia LQ, Hou SY, Wang ZW, Lu YS. Identification and functional characterization of Histone-like DNA-binding protein in Nocardia seriolae (NsHLP) involved in cell apoptosis. Journal of Fish Diseases, 2019, 42(5): 657-666. DOI:10.1111/jfd.12962 |
[33] | Gay G, Braun L, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Vollaire J, Josserand V, Bertini RL, Varesano A, Touquet B, De Bock PJ, Coute Y, Tardieux I, Bougdour A, Hakimi MA. Toxoplasma gondii TgIST co-opts host chromatin repressors dampening STAT1-dependent gene regulation and IFN-γ-mediated host defenses. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2016, 213(9): 1779-1798. DOI:10.1084/jem.20160340 |
[34] | Han B, Polonais V, Sugi T, Yakubu R, Takvorian PM, Cali A, Maier K, Long MX, Levy M, Tanowitz HB, Pan GQ, Delbac F, Zhou ZY, Weiss LM. The role of microsporidian polar tube protein 4 (PTP4) in host cell infection. PLoS Pathogens, 2017, 13(4): e1006341. DOI:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006341 |
[35] | Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nature Methods, 2015, 12(4): 357-360. DOI:10.1038/nmeth.3317 |
[36] | Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang TC, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nature Biotechnology, 2015, 33(3): 290-295. DOI:10.1038/nbt.3122 |
[37] | Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology, 2014, 15(12): 550. DOI:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 |
[38] | Yu GC, Wang LG, Han YY, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Omics, 2012, 16(5): 284-287. DOI:10.1089/omi.2011.0118 |
[39] | Almagro Armenteros JJ, Tsirigos KD, Sønderby CK, Petersen TN, Winther O, Brunak S, Von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks. Nature Biotechnology, 2019, 37(4): 420-423. DOI:10.1038/s41587-019-0036-z |
[40] | Kosugi S, Hasebe M, Tomita M, Yanagawa H. Systematic identification of cell cycle-dependent yeast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins by prediction of composite motifs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(25): 10171-10176. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0900604106 |
[41] | Lobingier BT, Hüttenhain R, Eichel K, Miller KB, Ting AY, Von Zastrow M, Krogan NJ. An approach to spatiotemporally resolve protein interaction networks in living cells. Cell, 2017, 169(2): 350-360. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.022 |
[42] | Pemberton LF, Paschal BM. Mechanisms of receptor-mediated nuclear import and nuclear export. Traffic, 2005, 6(3): 187-198. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00270.x |
[43] | Wu WWH, Sun YHB, Panté N. Nuclear import of influenza a viral ribonucleoprotein complexes is mediated by two nuclear localization sequences on viral nucleoprotein. Virology Journal, 2007, 4: 49. DOI:10.1186/1743-422X-4-49 |
[44] | Wang ZY, Zhang H, Cheng Q. PDIA4: the basic characteristics, functions and its potential connection with cancer. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2020, 122: 109688. |
[45] | Perri ER, Thomas CJ, Parakh S, Spencer DM, Atkin JD. The unfolded protein response and the role of protein disulfide isomerase in neurodegeneration. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2016, 3: 80. DOI:10.3389/fcell.2015.00080 |
[46] | Meunier L, Usherwood YK, Chung KT, Hendershot LM. A subset of chaperones and folding enzymes form multiprotein complexes in endoplasmic reticulum to bind nascent proteins. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 2002, 13(12): 4456-4469. DOI:10.1091/mbc.e02-05-0311 |
[47] | Lu HS, Yu D, Hansen AS, Ganguly S, Liu RD, Heckert A, Darzacq X, Zhou Q. Phase-separation mechanism for C-terminal hyperphosphorylation of RNA polymerase Ⅱ. Nature, 2018, 558(7709): 318-323. DOI:10.1038/s41586-018-0174-3 |
[48] | Merulla J, Fasana E, Soldà T, Molinari M. Specificity and regulation of the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation machinery. Traffic, 2013, 14(7): 767-777. DOI:10.1111/tra.12068 |
[49] | Celli J, Tsolis RM. Bacteria, the endoplasmic reticulum and the unfolded protein response: friends or foes?. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2015, 13(2): 71-82. DOI:10.1038/nrmicro3393 |
[50] | Brosson D, Kuhn L, Delbac F, Garin J, P Vivarès C, Texier C. Proteomic analysis of the eukaryotic parasite Encephalitozoon cuniculi (microsporidia): a reference map for proteins expressed in late sporogonial stages. Proteomics, 2006, 6(12): 3625-3635. DOI:10.1002/pmic.200500796 |
[51] | Berglund J, Gjondrekaj R, Verney E, Maupin-Furlow JA, Edelmann MJ. Modification of the host ubiquitome by bacterial enzymes. Microbiological Research, 2020, 235: 126429. DOI:10.1016/j.micres.2020.126429 |
[52] | Hicks SW, Galán JE. Hijacking the host ubiquitin pathway: structural strategies of bacterial E3 ubiquitin ligases. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 2010, 13(1): 41-46. DOI:10.1016/j.mib.2009.11.008 |
[53] | Didier ES, Didier PJ, Friedberg DN, Stenson SM, Orenstein JM, Vee RW, Tio FO, Davis RM, Vossbrinck C, Millichamp N, Shadduck JA. Isolation and characterization of a new human microsporidian, Encephalitozoon hellem (n. sp.), from three AIDS patients with keratoconjunctivitis. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1991, 163(3): 617-621. DOI:10.1093/infdis/163.3.617 |
[54] | Hinney B, Sak B, Joachim A, Kváč M. More than a rabbit's tale-Encephalitozoon spp. in wild mammals and birds. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife, 2016, 5(1): 76-87. DOI:10.1016/j.ijppaw.2016.01.001 |
[55] | Han B, Moretto M, M Weiss L. Encephalitozoon: tissue culture, cryopreservation, and murine infection. Current Protocols in Microbiology, 2019, 52(1): e72. DOI:10.1002/cpmc.72 |