不同PCR引物在根系丛枝菌根真菌群落研究中的应用比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家“973 计划”(2012CB026105);国家自然科学基金(31170482,31300445,31370450);教育部博士点基金(20110211110021,20130211120005);中国博士后科学基金(2013M540780,2014T70949);兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费(LZUJBKY-2014-201)


Comparison of different PCR primers on detecting arbuscular mycorrhizal communities inside plant roots
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Supported by the National Basic Research Programs of China (2012CB026105),by the National Natural Foundation of China (31170482,31300445,31370450),by the PhD Programs Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (20110211110021,20130211120005),by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M540780,2014T70949) and by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China (LZUJBKY-2014-201)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:【目的】基础PCR的各种分子技术已广泛地应用于丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)的群落研究。为探讨不同PCR引物对丛枝菌根真菌群落的特异性差异扩增。【方法】本研究选取4对AMF特异性引物(NS31-AM1,AML1-AML2,NS31-AML2和SSUmCf-LSUmBr),通过PCR、克隆及测序技术对AMF的多样性及群落结构进行了分析比较。【结果】不同引物对AMF的扩增特异性及覆盖度均有显著性差异,且不同引物得到的AMF群落结构也存在显著性差异。SSUmCf-LSUmBr的扩增特异性及覆盖度最高,NS31-AML2和NS31-AM1次之,而AML1-AML2则相对较差。【结论】NS31-AML2的扩增区段能很好地与越来越被认可的AMF VT分类数据库(http://maarjam.botany.ut.ee)相匹配,且扩增片段长度也适合于目前的高通量测序技术。基于此,本文推荐NS31-AML2为AMF群落研究中的首选引物。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:[Objective] Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) colonizing roots have been increasingly investigated by molecular approaches with AMF-specific PCR primers. However,it is difficult to compare the species diversity and species compositions of AMF communities across various studies due to the PCR primers used differently,and also little is known if significant difference of community compositions is characterized by different primers. We aim to compare the difference of efficiency of four primers for AMF.[Methods]We chose four commonly used AMF-specific primer combinations (NS31-AM1,AML1-AML2,NS31-AML2 and SSUmCf-LSUmBr),and used 18S rDNA clone libraries to describe the AMF diversity and community.[Results]Our results showed that the specificity and coverage varied among the tested primers,different primer combinations would yield distinct patterns of species diversity and composition of AMF community. SSUmCf-LSUmBr had the best specificity and coverage in amplifying AMF sequences,followed by NS31-AML2 and NS31-AM1,and AML1-AML2 showed the lowest specificity towards AMF sequences. [Conclusion]SSUmCf-LSUmBr is not the optimal primer pair for AMF community study in current stage due to limited reference sequences and large DNA size. As an alternative,NS31-AML2 is more suitable in AMF community study,because its target rDNA region could well match the increasingly used virtual taxonomy database (http://maarjam.botany.ut.ee) and also its suitable DNA size could be efficiently used in high-throughput sequencing.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

蒋胜竞,石国玺,毛琳,潘建斌,安黎哲,刘永俊,冯虎元. 不同PCR引物在根系丛枝菌根真菌群落研究中的应用比较. 微生物学报, 2015, 55(7): 916-925

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-04
  • 最后修改日期:2015-01-22
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-07-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码