荧光扫描法快速检测肽核酸分子信标标记的单增李斯特菌
作者:
基金项目:

国家质量监督检验检疫总局科研项目(2013IK189,2015IK301);浙江省公益技术应用研究计划项目(2015C33042)


Molecular beacon based PNA-FISH method combined with fluorescence scanning for rapid detection of Listeria monocytogenes
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [11]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 建立了单核细胞增多性李斯特菌(Listeria monocytogenes,单增李斯特菌)的肽核酸(Peptide nucleic acid, PNA)分子信标(Molecular beacon)的荧光扫描检测方法,以简化普通PNA原位荧光杂交(Fluorescence in situ hybridization, FISH)检测方法中显微镜观察步骤。[方法] 在具有单增李斯特菌特异性的肽核酸探针的5′和3′分别标记报告荧光基团和淬灭基团形成分子信标PNA探针,利用FISH技术和荧光扫描技术对单增李斯特菌进行检测。[结果] 用普通PNA探针进行荧光扫描检测时,以N1处理为空白对照,假阳性率11.4%,假阴性率为0;以N2处理为空白时,假阳性率降低至4.3%,但假阴性率上升为18.6%。用分子信标PNA探针进行检测时,用N1为空白对照时,假阳性率8.6%,假阴性率为1.4%;以N2处理作为空白时,假阳性率5.7%,假阴性率为1.4%。与普通探针比较,分子信标PNA探针能有效减少假阳性和假阴性的发生。2种普通PNA探针的杂交成功率分别为83.3%和95.2%;2种“分子信标化”的肽核酸探针的成功率分别为91.7%和90.5%,表明探针两端标记并不会降低与目标菌的杂交成功率。[结论] 将液相PNA-FISH和荧光扫描技术结合,通过大通量快速的荧光扫描检测可大幅提高检测效率。同时将肽核酸探针分子信标化,有效的降低了荧光扫描结果的假阳性,并通过了N1和N2两种空白对照处理把假阴性控制在较低的范围。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] To simplify the PNA-FISH (Peptide nucleic acid-fluorescence in situ hybridization) test, molecular beacon based PNA probe combined with fluorescence scanning detection technology was applied to replace the original microscope observation to detect Listeria monocytogenes. [Methods] The 5′ end and 3′ end of the L. monocytogenes specific PNA probes were labeled with the fluorescent group and the quenching group respectively, to form a molecular beacon based PNA probe. [Results] When PNA probe used for fluorescence scanning and N1 treatment as the control, the false positive rate was 11.4%, and the false negative rate was 0; when N2 treatment as the control, the false positive rate decreased to 4.3%, but the false negative rate rose to 18.6%. When beacon based PNA probe used for fluorescence scanning, taken N1 treatment as blank control, the false positive rate was 8.6%, and the false negative rate was 1.4%; taken N2 treatment as blank control, the false positive rate was 5.7%, and the false negative rate was 1.4%. Compared with PNA probe, molecular beacon based PNA probe can effectively reduce false positives and false negatives. The success rates of hybridization of the two PNA probes were 83.3% and 95.2% respectively; and the rates of the two beacon based PNA probes were 91.7% and 90.5% respectively, which indicated that labeling the both ends of the PNA probe dose not decrease the hybridization rate with the target bacteria. [Conclusions] The combination of liquid phase PNA-FISH and fluorescence scanning method, can significantly improve the detection efficiency.

    参考文献
    [1] Volokhov D, Rasooly A, Chumakov K, Chizhikov V. Identification of Listeria species by microarray-based assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002, 40(12): 4720-4728.
    [2] Allerberger F, Dierich M, Petranyi G, Lalic M, Bubert A. Nonhemolytic strains of Listeria monocytogenes detected in milk products using VIDAS immunoassay kit. Zentralblatt für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, 1997, 200(2/3): 189-195.
    [3] Ingianni A, Floris M, Palomba P, Madeddu MA, Quartuccio M, Pompei R. Rapid detection of Listeria monocytogenes in foods, by a combination of PCR and DNA probe. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 2001, 15(5): 275-280.
    [4] Zeng HY, Zhang XF, Sun Z, Fang WH. Multiplex PCR identification of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from milk and milk-processing environments. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2006, 86(3): 367-371.
    [5] Amann R, Fuchs BM. Single-cell identification in microbial communities by improved fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2008, 6(5): 339-348.
    [6] Almeida C, Azevedo NF, Fernandes RM, Keevil CW, Vieira MJ. Fluorescence in situ hybridization method using a peptide nucleic acid probe for identification of Salmonella spp. in a broad spectrum of samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2010, 76(13): 4476-4485.
    [7] Schmid M, Walcher M, Bubert A, Wagner M, Wagner M, Schleifer KH. Nucleic acid-based, cultivation-independent detection of Listeria spp. and genotypes of L. monocytogenes. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, 2003, 35(3): 215-225.
    [8] Daims H, Wagner M. Quantification of uncultured microorganisms by fluorescence microscopy and digital image analysis. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, 75(2): 237-248.
    [9] Morgan M, Marlowe E, Della-Latta P, Salimnia H, Novak-Weekley S, Wu F, Crystal BS. Multicenter evaluation of a new shortened peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization procedure for species identification of select gram-negative bacilli from blood cultures. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2010, 48(6): 2268-2270.
    [10] Zhang XF, Wu S, Li K, Shuai JB, Dong Q, Fang WH. Peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization for identification of Listeria genus, Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria ivanovii. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2012, 157(2): 309-313.
    [11] Perry-O'Keefe H, Stender H, Broomer A, Oliveira K, Coull J, Hyldig-Nielsen JJ. Filter-based PNA in situ hybridization for rapid detection, identification and enumeration of specific micro-organisms. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2001, 90(2): 180-189.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

吴姗,张晓峰,帅江冰,李可,虞惠贞,金晨晨. 荧光扫描法快速检测肽核酸分子信标标记的单增李斯特菌[J]. 微生物学报, 2016, 56(7): 1105-1112

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:938
  • 下载次数: 1543
  • HTML阅读次数: 635
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-21
  • 最后修改日期:2016-02-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-06-28
文章二维码