猪小肠微生物对不同蛋白源的体外发酵特性比较
作者:
基金项目:

国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2013CB127300)


Effect of different nitrogen source on porcine small intestinal fermentation in vitro
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [21]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]采用体外发酵技术比较小肠微生物对不同蛋白源的发酵规律。[方法]以成年猪的十二指肠、空肠和回肠内容物为接种物,以豆粕、菜粕或鱼粉水解物上清液为氮源底物,于发酵的0、4、8、12 h分别测定发酵液pH、微生物蛋白、氨氮和挥发性脂肪酸含量,同时提取细菌DNA并进行定量分析。[结果]添加含氮底物的空肠组和回肠组氨氮浓度和菌体蛋白浓度均相对增加,尤其是酶解菜粕组菌体蛋白合成量较高;十二指肠组菌体蛋白浓度以及氨氮含量不断减少。各发酵组乳酸和挥发酸快速积累,4-8 h积累量最大;8 h后空肠组和回肠组乳酸和挥发酸含量相对稳定,而十二指肠组后期丙酸含量增加约2 mmol/L,并伴随着乳酸含量的相对减少。同时,各组中总细菌、拟杆菌门、厚壁菌门和乳酸杆菌数量相对增加,且略高于无氮组,但不同蛋白源组间无显著差异。[结论]在体外培养条件下,空肠和回肠微生物具有相似的发酵规律,均能快速利用培养液中的含氮物质合成菌体蛋白;十二指肠微生物具有较强的产挥发酸能力,能够转化乳酸并大量产生丁酸和丙酸,这有利于宿主营养功能和肠道健康。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] We studied the effect of different nitrogen source on bacteria from porcine small intestine.[Methods] Digesta samples from different segments of the small intestine were inoculated into media containing enzyme-treated protein (soybean meal, rapeseed meal or fish meal) and incubated for 12 h.[Results] After incubation of jejunal and ileal microbes, the contents of ammonia and microbial crude protein increased in groups with nitrogen resources, especially the groups with rapeseed meal which had the highest increment of microbial crude protein. However, concentrations of microbial crude protein and ammonia decreased in duodenal groups. Besides, concentrations of volatile fatty acid and lactate increased in all groups, and acetate concentrations were more than 50% of the total volatile fatty acid concentration. The contents of propionate and butyrate increased in duodenal groups, whereas the contents of lactate decreased during the last four hours. However, propionate and butyrate were not changed in jejunal and ileal groups. The copy numbers of total bacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroides and Lactobacillus increased during the experiment, but it was not significantly different between groups with different enzyme-treated protein.[Conclusion] Protein after digestion would be utilized by jejunal and ileal microbes, which mostly used to produce microbial crude protein. Duodenal microbes would utilize lactate and produce propionate and butyrate.

    参考文献
    [1] Dai ZL, Zhang J, Wu GY, Zhu WY. Utilization of amino acids by bacteria from the pig small intestine. Amino Acids, 2010, 39(5):1201-1215.
    [2] Yang YX, Dai ZL, Zhu WY. Important impacts of intestinal bacteria on utilization of dietary amino acids in pigs. Amino Acids, 2014, 46(11):2489-2501.
    [3] Torrallardona D, Harris CI, Coates ME, Fuller MF. Microbial amino acid synthesis and utilization in rats:incorporation of 15N from 15NH4Cl into lysine in the tissues of germ-free and conventional rats. British Journal of Nutrition, 1996, 76(5):689-709.
    [4] Rist VTS, Weiss E, Sauer N, Mosenthin R, Eklund M. Effect of dietary protein supply originating from soybean meal or casein on the intestinal microbiota of piglets. Anaerobe, 2014, 25:72-79.
    [5] Santos AS, Ferreira LMM, Martin-Rosset W, Cotovio M, Silva F, Bennett RN, Cone JW, Bessa RJB, Rodrigues MAM. The influence of casein and urea as nitrogen sources on in vitro equine caecal fermentation. Animal, 2012, 6(7):1096-1102.
    [6] Jung TH, Park JH, Jeon WM, Han KS. Butyrate modulates bacterial adherence on LS174T human colorectal cells by stimulating mucin secretion and MAPK signaling pathway. Nutrition Research and Practice, 2015, 9(4):343-349.
    [7] Huang RL, Tan ZL, Xing TX, Pan YF, Li TJ. An in vitro method for the estimation of ileal crude protein and amino acids digestibility using the dialysis tubing for pig feedstuffs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2000, 88(1/2):79-89.
    [8] Ma ML, He XY, Zhu WY. Metabolic pattern of pig hindgut bacteria on aromatic amino acids by an in vitro fermentation method. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2016, 56(11):1786-1793. (in Chinese)马梅蕾, 何香玉, 朱伟云. 体外法研究猪后肠道对芳香族氨基酸的发酵特性. 微生物学报, 2016, 56(11):1786-1793.
    [9] Ma YY, Cheng YF, Zhu WY. Different origins and stubbles of alfalfa:Evaluation of hutritional value by an in vitro fermentation method. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2014, 26(8):2421-2432. (in Chinese)马艳艳, 成艳芬, 朱伟云. 体外发酵法评价不同产地、不同茬次苜蓿的营养价值. 动物营养学报, 2014, 26(8):2421-2432.
    [10] Weatherburn MW. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry, 1967, 39(8):971-974.
    [11] Makkar HPS, Sharma OP, Dawra RK, Negi SS. Simple determination of microbial protein in rumen liquor. Journal of Dairy Science, 1982, 65(11):2170-2173.
    [12] Mao SY, Zhu WY, Wang QJ, Yao W. Effect of daidzein on in vitro fermentation by microorganisms from the goat rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2007, 136(1/2):154-163.
    [13] Yang LN, Bian GR, Su Y, Zhu WY. Comparison of faecal microbial community of Lantang, Bama, Erhualian, Meishan, Xiaomeishan, Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire sows. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2014, 27(6):898-906.
    [14] Salter DN, Daneshvar K, Smith RH. The origin of nitrogen incorporated into compounds in the rumen bacteria of steers given protein-and urea-containing diets. British Journal of Nutrition, 1979, 41(1):197-209.
    [15] Guadagnin M, Tagliapietra F, Cattani M, Schiavon S, Worgan HJ, Belanche A, Newbold CJ, Bailoni L. Rumen fermentation and microbial yield of high-or low-protein diets containing ground soybean seeds or homemade rapeseed expellers evaluated with RUSITEC. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 2013, 93(3):363-371.
    [16] Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota:introducing the concept of prebiotics. Journal of Nutrition, 1995, 125(6):1401-1412.
    [17] Hume ID. Fermentation in the hindgut of mammals//Mackie RI, White BA. Gastrointestinal Microbiology. Boston, MA:Springer, 1997:84-115.
    [18] Macfarlane GT, Macfarlane S. Bacteria, colonic fermentation, and gastrointestinal health. Journal of AOAC International, 2012, 95(1):50-60.
    [19] Flint HJ, Duncan SH, Scott KP, Louis P. Interactions and competition within the microbial community of the human colon:links between diet and health. Environmental Microbiology, 2007, 9(5):1101-1111.
    [20] Smith EA, Macfarlane GT. Dissimilatory amino acid metabolism in human colonic bacteria. Anaerobe, 1997, 3(5):327-337.
    [21] Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Kinross J, Burcelin R, Gibson G, Jia W, Pettersson S. Host-Gut Microbiota metabolic interactions. Science, 2012, 336(6086):1262-1267.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘艺端,慕春龙,朱伟云. 猪小肠微生物对不同蛋白源的体外发酵特性比较[J]. 微生物学报, 2018, 58(2): 284-292

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:898
  • 下载次数: 1330
  • HTML阅读次数: 966
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-21
  • 最后修改日期:2017-06-10
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-01-26
文章二维码