日粮中添加不同比例微贮棉秆对湖羊瘤胃微生物区系的影响
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(31360558);动物消化道营养国际联合研究中心开放课题;江苏省“一带一路”技术合作项目(BZ2018055)


Effect of different proportions fermented cotton stalk intake on rumen microflora of lambs
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [35]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 本试验旨在利用16S rDNA高通量测序技术研究不同比例微贮棉秆的添加对断奶湖羊瘤胃微生物区系的影响。[方法] 选择日龄相近、体重相似的湖羊30只,根据日粮中微贮棉秆的含量随机分为3组:对照组(S0)、50%微贮棉秆组(S50)和100%微贮棉秆组(S100),每组随机屠宰6只分析生长性能,并取瘤胃液进行瘤胃发酵参数和微生物区系分析。[结果] 饲喂50%微贮棉秆能够显著提高湖羊日增重和屠宰率(P<0.05)。BacteroidetesFirmicutes是湖羊瘤胃的优势菌门,Prevotella和Unclassified Bacteroidales是湖羊瘤胃的优势菌属。日粮中添加100%微贮棉秆可以显著降低湖羊瘤胃菌群的多样性(P<0.05);显著降低Unclassified BacteroidalesBF311的相对丰度(P<0.05)。三条代谢通路甜菜素生物合成、吲哚生物碱生物合成和加压素调节水的重吸收随着微贮棉秆比例升高而显著增加(P<0.05)。[结论] 饲喂50%微贮棉秆在提高日增重的同时对湖羊瘤胃微生物菌群结构与功能影响较小。在生产实践中,微贮秸秆添加量应低于50%。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] The objective of this study was to assess the effect of fermented cotton stalk in the diet on rumen microflora of weaned lambs by using high-throughput sequencing technology.[Methods] Thirty Hu sheep were selected and randomly divided into three groups according to different proportions of fermented cotton stalk in the diet:the control (S0), 50% fermented cotton stalk (S50) and 100% fermented cotton stalk (S100), six sheep were randomly slaughtered in each group to analyze their growth performance, rumen fermentation parameters and microflora analysis.[Results] Feeding 50% fermented cotton stalk can significantly improve the daily gain and slaughter rate of lambs (P<0.05). Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes are the dominant phylum in the rumen, Prevotella and Unclassified Bacteroidales are the dominant genus of the rumen of the lambs. Adding 100% fermented cotton stalk to the diet could significantly reduce both the diversity of rumen microflora and the relative abundance of Unclassified Bacteroides and BF311 (P<0.05). Three metabolic pathways significantly increased as the proportion of fermented cotton stalk increased (P<0.05).[Conclusion] Feeding 50% fermented cotton stalk had little effect on the structure and function of rumen microflora while increasing daily weight. In production practice, the content of fermented stalk should be lower than 50%.

    参考文献
    [1] Gao RF, Zhang JS. Study on exploiting and utilizing cotton stalks of Xinjiang as feed. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2016, 52(8):76-79. (in Chinese) 高瑞芳, 张吉树. 新疆棉花秸秆饲料化开发利用研究. 中国畜牧杂志, 2016, 52(8):76-79.
    [2] Liu YF, Tang SZ, Sang DJ. Current situation of utilization and development of cotton straw as feed resource in Xinjiang. China Dairy Cattle, 2009, (9):27-30. (in Chinese) 刘艳丰, 唐淑珍, 桑断疾. 新疆棉花秸秆作为饲料资源的利用开发现状. 中国奶牛, 2009, (9):27-30.
    [3] Wei M, Luo QJ, Pan R, Li CL. Initial evaluation on nutritional value of cotton stalk. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2003, 26(1):1-4. (in Chinese) 魏敏, 雒秋江, 潘榕, 李春兰. 对棉花秸秆饲用价值的基本评价. 新疆农业大学学报, 2003, 26(1):1-4.
    [4] Zheng Z, Lai XQ, Deng XD, Dai ZG. Technique of cotton stalks returned to field and preliminary calculation of stalk nutrient quantity in Xinjiang. Acta Gossypii Sinica, 2000, 12(5):264-266. (in Chinese) 郑重, 赖先齐, 邓湘娣, 戴志刚. 新疆棉区秸秆还田技术和养分需要量的初步估算. 棉花学报, 2000, 12(5):264-266.
    [5] Zhang ZJ, Guo TJ, Zhao J, Sang DJ, Shi Y, Cui JW. Effects of steam explosion and fermentation after steam explosion on nutrient value of cotton stalk. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2018, 30(9):3720-3725. (in Chinese) 张志军, 郭同军, 赵洁, 桑断疾, 石勇, 崔继文. 汽爆与汽爆后发酵对棉花秸秆营养价值的影响. 动物营养学报, 2018, 30(9):3720-3725.
    [6] Cui YX, Pan XL, Zhang SX, Pan Q, Wang ZG. The research progress of fermentation cotton stalk utilization. Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici, 2011, 32(1):90-93. (in Chinese) 崔艳霞, 潘晓亮, 张书信, 潘奇, 王振国. 棉秆生物发酵利用的研究进展. 家畜生态学报, 2011, 32(1):90-93.
    [7] Kong L, Bao QB, Liu C, Yu L. Application of microbial fermentation feed. Feed Review, 2014, (2):16-19. (in Chinese) 孔凌, 包清彬, 刘超, 喻麟. 微生物发酵饲料及其应用. 饲料博览, 2014, (2):16-19.
    [8] Chen K, Chen H, Liu DJ. Effects of fermented feed on goat production performance. China Feed, 2018, (2):25-29. (in Chinese) 陈柯, 陈华, 刘大军. 微生物发酵秸秆对山羊生产性能的影响及其机理研究. 中国饲料, 2018, (2):25-29.
    [9] Li JZ, Xu G, Yang M, Cao YC, Liu CL, Liu S, Du LJ. Study on nutrition value of rice straw storage and effect of feeding sheep. China Herbivore Science, 2016, 36(1):61-63. (in Chinese) 李建臻, 徐刚, 杨苗, 曹雨辰, 刘昌林, 刘水, 杜龙基. 微贮稻秸营养价值及饲喂肉羊效果研究. 中国草食动物科学, 2016, 36(1):61-63.
    [10] Liu JP, Liu DS, Zhang YH, He YX. Experiment on effect of micro-storage cotton straw in raising sheep. Xinjiang Xumuye, 2016, (11):36-37. (in Chinese) 刘家平, 刘东山, 张运海, 何玉新. 微贮棉花秸秆养羊效果试验. 新疆畜牧业, 2016, (11):36-37.
    [11] Weatherburn MW. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry, 1967, 39(8):971-974.
    [12] Makkar HPS, Sharma OP, Dawra RK, Negi SS. Simple determination of microbial protein in rumen liquor. Journal of Dairy Science, 1982, 65(11):2170-2173.
    [13] Zoetendal EG, Akkermans ADL, De Vos WM. Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of 16S rRNA from human fecal samples reveals stable and host-specific communities of active bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1998, 64(10):3854-3859.
    [14] Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biology, 2011, 12(6):R60.
    [15] Zhang YG, Hu HC, Shi LG, Peng WQ, Li M, Huang Y, Xu TS, Zhou HL. Effects of different proportions of roughage on growth, nutrient digestibility and blood biochemical indices of Hainan black goat. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2018, 45(11):3086-3094. (in Chinese) 张亚格, 胡海超, 施力光, 彭维祺, 李茂, 黄艳, 徐铁山, 周汉林. 不同配比粗饲料对海南黑山羊生长、养分消化及血液生化指标的影响. 中国畜牧兽医, 2018, 45(11):3086-3094.
    [16] Gao F. Study on the effects of probiotics feed on feeding mutton. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 40(10):131-133. (in Chinese) 高飞. 微生态制剂饲料饲喂肉羊效果研究. 河南农业科学, 2011, 40(10):131-133.
    [17] Zheng AR, Wang YX, Zheng CL, Zheng AW, Li JW, Wang WQ. Effect of straw micro-storage on production performance of hybrid sheep. Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2016, 48(8):55-58. (in Chinese) 郑爱荣, 王跃先, 郑春雷, 郑爱武, 李焦魏, 王卫秦. 秸秆微贮饲料对杜寒杂交羊生产性能的影响. 畜牧与兽医, 2016, 48(8):55-58.
    [18] Argyle JL, Baldwin RL. Modeling of rumen water kinetics and effects of rumen pH changes. Journal of Dairy Science, 1988, 71(5):1178-1188.
    [19] Langille MGI, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, Clemente JC, Burkepile DE, Vega Thurber RL, Knight R, Beiko RG, Huttenhower C. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 31(9):814-821.
    [20] Jiang X, Cui ZQ, Liu X, Zhang LY, Liu S, Zhang YG. Effect of fermented corn gluten meal on growth, blood indices, ruminal flora and nutrient digestibility in calves. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2019, 50(2):46-55. (in Chinese) 姜鑫, 崔梓琪, 刘鑫, 张立阳, 刘帅, 张永根. 发酵玉米蛋白粉对犊牛生长、血液指标、瘤胃菌群和营养物质消化的影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2019, 50(2):46-55.
    [21] Yang L, Wang BH, Jin Y. Advances in rumen microflora and nutrient deposition in ruminants. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2017, (15):85-87, 90. (in Chinese) 杨蕾, 王柏辉, 靳烨. 反刍动物瘤胃菌群与机体营养沉积研究进展. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2017, (15):85-87, 90.
    [22] Kelsen J, Wu GD. The gut microbiota and IBD//Mamula P, Markowitz J, Baldassano R. Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease. New York:Springer, 2013:35-42.
    [23] Fonty G, Gouet P, Jouany JP, Senaud J. Establishment of the microflora and anaerobic fungi in the rumen of lambs. Journal of General Microbiology, 1987, 133(7):1835-1843.
    [24] 董瑞阳. 粗饲料组合对泌乳牛与干奶牛甲烷产量、瘤胃发酵模式及微生物菌群的影响. 河南农业大学硕士学位论文, 2014.
    [25] Kong YH, He ML, McAlister T, Seviour R, Forster R. Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization of microbial communities in the rumens of cattle fed different diets. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2010, 76(20):6933-6938.
    [26] 岳喜新. 蛋白水平及饲喂量对早期断奶羔羊生长性能及消化代谢的影响. 塔里木大学硕士学位论文, 2011.
    [27] Shoaie S, Karlsson F, Mardinoglu A, Nookaew I, Bordel S, Nielsen J. Understanding the interactions between bacteria in the human gut through metabolic modeling. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3:2532.
    [28] Myer PR, Smith TPL, Wells JE, Kuehn LA, Freetly HC. Rumen microbiome from steers differing in feed efficiency. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6):e0129174.
    [29] Jami E, White BA, Mizrahi I. Potential role of the bovine rumen microbiome in modulating milk composition and feed efficiency. PLoS One, 2014, 9(1):e85423.
    [30] Aschenbach JR, Penner GB, Stumpff F, Gäbel G. RUMINANT NUTRITION SYMPOSIUM:Role of fermentation acid absorption in the regulation of ruminal pH. Journal of Animal Science, 2011, 89(4):1092-1097.
    [31] Guo TT, Hu DD, Fu ZL, Li N, Xu XF. Effects of mannan oligosaccharides on rumen microflora structure of dairy cows based on 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing technology. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2018, 30(10):4048-4058. (in Chinese) 郭婷婷, 胡丹丹, 付子琳, 李娜, 徐晓锋. 基于16S rDNA高通量测序分析技术研究甘露寡糖对奶牛瘤胃菌群结构的影响. 动物营养学报, 2018, 30(10):4048-4058.
    [32] Wu SG, Wang GT, Angert ER, Wang WW, Li WX, Zou H. Composition, diversity, and origin of the bacterial community in grass carp intestine. PLoS One, 2012, 7(2):e30440.
    [33] Hu DD, Guo TT, Li N, Zhang LL, Xu XF. Effect of fructooligosaccharide on the structure and diversity of rumen bacterial community in dairy cow by 16S rDNA sequencing technology. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2018, 45(10):2761-2771. (in Chinese) 胡丹丹, 郭婷婷, 李娜, 张力莉, 徐晓锋. 以16S rDNA高通量测序法研究果寡糖对奶牛瘤胃菌群结构及多样性的影响. 中国畜牧兽医, 2018, 45(10):2761-2771.
    [34] 谢骁. 低质粗饲料日粮干预对湖羊瘤胃发酵和微生物菌群的影响. 浙江大学博士学位论文, 2018.
    [35] Purushe J, Fouts DE, Morrison M, White BA, Mackie RI, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B, Nelson KE. Comparative genome analysis of Prevotella ruminicola and Prevotella bryantii:Insights into their environmental niche. Microbial Ecology, 2010, 60(4):721-729.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

李与琦,阳建华,张涛,孙新文,王新峰,毛胜勇,成艳芬,朱伟云. 日粮中添加不同比例微贮棉秆对湖羊瘤胃微生物区系的影响[J]. 微生物学报, 2020, 60(8): 1592-1604

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:648
  • 下载次数: 1205
  • HTML阅读次数: 1526
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-02
  • 最后修改日期:2019-12-02
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-08-06
文章二维码