大连地区腮腺炎病毒G基因型全基因组特征
作者:
作者单位:

1.科兴(大连)疫苗技术有限公司,辽宁 大连;2.大连市妇女儿童医疗中心(集团),辽宁 大连;3.大连民族大学,辽宁 大连

作者简介:

钱盈:实验设计、数据分析及文章撰写;景淑军:病例搜集及数据分析;郑国君:病毒分离及滴定;杨扬:毒株测序;弓晓杰:研究调研和文章修改;李中玉:研究调研和文章修改;李悦:病例搜集及数据分析;孟凡红:动物免疫及数据分析;宋俐霏:研究指导及文章审阅。

基金项目:

辽宁省科学技术计划-揭榜挂帅(科技攻关专项) (2022JH1/10400012)


Genomic characteristics of mumps virus genotype G in Dalian
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Sinovac (Dalian) Vaccine Technology Co., Ltd., Dalian, Liaoning, China;2.Dalian Women and Children’s Medical Group, Dalian, Liaoning, China;3.Dalian Minzu University, Dalian, Liaoning, China

Fund Project:

This work was supported by the Liaoning Province’s Science and Technology Plan “Jie Bang Gua Shuai” (Special Foundation for Science and Technology Research) (2022JH1/10400012).

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [16]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 腮腺炎病毒(mumps virus, MuV)是引起流行性腮腺炎的病原体,目前国内广泛流行的为F基因型,局部地区出现G基因型,且存在逐渐扩大趋势。为了解国内G基因型MuV全基因组的基因特征,本研究选择辽宁大连地区分离到的2株腮腺炎G基因型毒株进行分析。方法 对2株腮腺炎毒株进行全基因组测序,依据世界卫生组织(World Health Organization, WHO)各基因型参考毒株序列确认毒株型别,同时开展分子生物学分析,对腮腺炎各基因型别间及G基因型内差异进行比较;结合我国其他地区G基因型毒株的基因组序列信息,分析我国G基因型MuV的全基因组特点及其与现有疫苗株的遗传距离及关键抗原位点变异情况。结果 本研究分离毒株为G基因型,与已划分的12个基因型间核苷酸差异为4.2%-6.9%,与A基因型差异最大;蛋白编码基因中,SH基因变异最大,NP、M和L基因相对保守,P基因、F基因、HN基因型间差异较大。本研究分离的G基因型毒株与GenBank数据库国内分离株江苏省毒株(Jiangsu.CHN/22.13/2)亲缘关系最近,与同为辽宁地区分离株存在差异。在关键抗原表位中,本研究分离的G基因型毒株与疫苗株相比在HN蛋白少了aa 12-14位N-糖基化位点,但多了aa 464-466位N-糖基化位点,在中和表位中,G基因型毒株与A基因型疫苗株差异较大,提示这些氨基酸位点的变异很可能会潜在地降低腮腺炎疫苗株对MuV野毒株的交叉保护作用,而F蛋白虽然有氨基酸差异,但功能区域较为保守。结论 本研究详细分析了大连地区G基因型毒株的基因型别特征,与国内G基因型毒株及参考毒株整体较为相似,存在部分差异位点,但与全球范围内使用的疫苗株(A基因型)差异较大。本研究提示未来需持续开展国内腮腺炎病例监控,对流行病学和病毒学特征进行分析,为国内腮腺炎病毒溯源、传播途径及免疫策略制定提供方向。

    Abstract:

    Objective Mumps virus (MuV) is the causative agent of mumps. Nowadays, genotype F is widely prevalent in China, while genotype G appears in localized areas and is exhibiting a trend of gradual expansion. To understand the genetic characteristics of genotype G strains in China, we selected two genotype G MuV strains that were isolated from Dalian, Liaoning for analysis.Methods The whole genomes of the two strains were sequenced, and the genotypes were determined according to the WHO reference strains. Furthermore, we compared the molecular characteristics among different genotypes and within genotype G. By comparison with the sequences of genotype G strains in other areas of China, we analyzed the features of genotype G MuVs in China, as well as the genetic distance and variations of key antigenic sites between the wild-type genotype G strains and the existing vaccine strains.Results The strains isolated in this study both belonged to genotype G, and they showed the nucleotide differences ranging from 4.2% to 6.9% from other 12 genotypes, with the greatest divergence from genotype A. Among the protein coding genes, the SH coding gene exhibited the largest variation, while the NP, M, and L coding genes were conserved. The P, F and HN coding genes demonstrated significant differences among different genotypes. The genotype G strains isolated in this study were closely related to the strain isolated in Jiangsu Province (Jiangsu.CHN/22.13/2), while they were distinct from the strains previously isolated in Liaoning Province. The genotype G strains isolated in this study lacked a N-glycosylation site (aa 12-14) but gained a N-glycosylation site (aa 464-466) in the key epitope of HN protein. In addition, the genotype G strains showed considerable differences in terms of neutralizing epitopes from the genotype A vaccine strain. These differences suggested that the mutations of these sites may potentially reduce the cross-protection effects of vaccine strains against wild-type MuV strains. Although there were some mutations in F protein, the functional region was conserved.Conclusion This study details the genotypic characteristics of genotype G MuVs in Dalian, highlighting their high similarities to the genotype G strains in China and the WHO reference strains, while underscoring significant differences from the genotype A vaccine strain used worldwide. These findings suggest the necessity of continuous surveillance of MuV strains in China and further studies of their epidemiology and virology, which could provide references for tracing MuVs, cutting the transmission route, and developing immunization strategies in China.

    参考文献
    [1] 方兴, 常琳, 姚文清. 辽宁省扩大国家免疫规划前后流行性腮腺炎流行病学特征变化分析[J]. 中国生物制品学杂志, 2019, 32(3): 315-318.FANG X, CHANG L, YAO WQ. Change of epidemiological characteristics of mumps before and after implementation of the expanded program on immunization in Liaoning Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Biologicals, 2019, 32(3): 315-318 (in Chinese).
    [2] 蒋蕊鞠, 殷琼洲, 徐明珏, 赵志梅, 邓燕, 车艳春. 2004-2018年全国流行性腮腺炎发病特征及重点防控人群分析[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2019, 21(5): 441-444.JIANG RJ, YIN QZ, XU MJ, ZHAO ZM, DENG Y, CHE YC. Epidemiological characteristics of mumps in China’s mainland from 2004 to 2018 and key population for prevention and control[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 2019, 21(5): 441-444 (in Chinese).
    [3] WHO. Mumps virus nomenclature update: 2012[J]. Releve Epidemiologique Hebdomadaire, 2012, 87(22): 217-224.
    [4] 崔爱利. 中国腮腺炎病毒血凝素神经氨酸酶分子进化及其对疫苗保护效果影响[D]. 北京: 中国疾病预防控制中心博士学位论文, 2017.CUI AL. Molecular evolution of hemagglutinin neuraminidase of mumps virus in China and its effect on vaccine protection[D]. Beijing: Doctoral Dissertation of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,2017 (in Chinese).
    [5] 王媛, 朱贞, 邓丽丽, 秦月, 黄芳, 陈萌, 王常银, 彭晓放, 陈海云, 马钰, 张婷, 范丽霞, 李立群, 刘李, 玛合木提江·库尔班, 徐昌平, 张燕, 毛乃颖, 许文波, 崔爱利, 王英. 2018—2019年中国流行性腮腺炎流行特征和病毒基因特征分析[J]. 病毒学报, 2021, 37(2): 356-362.WANG Y, ZHU Z, DENG LL, QIN Y, HUANG F, CHEN M, WANG CY, PENG XF, CHEN HY, MA Y, ZHANG T, FAN LX, LI LQ, LIU L, Mhmtj Kurban, XU CP, ZHANG Y, MAO NY, XU WB, CUI AL, WANG Y. Analysis of the epidemiology and viral genetic characteristics of mumps in China during 2018-2019[J]. Chinese Journal of Virology, 2021, 37(2): 356-362 (in Chinese).
    [6] 崔爱利, 朱贞, 张燕, 邱琪, 毛乃颖, 许松涛, 姬奕昕, 王慧玲, 许文波. 2001—2017年中国流行性腮腺炎病毒学监测及基因特征分析[J]. 中国疫苗和免疫, 2018, 24(3): 249-255.CUI AL, ZHU Z, ZHANG Y, QIU Q, MAO NY, XU ST, JI YX, WANG HL, XU WB. Viral surveillance and genetic characteristics of mumps viruses in China during 2001-2017[J]. Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization, 2018, 24(3): 249-255 (in Chinese).
    [7] LI M, SCHMITT PT, LI Z, McCRORY TS, HE B, SCHMITT AP. Mumps virus matrix, fusion, and nucleocapsid proteins cooperate for efficient production of virus-like particles[J]. Journal of Virology, 2009, 83(14): 7261-7272.
    [8] CUI AL, BROWN DWG, XU WB, JIN L. Genetic variation in the HN and SH genes of mumps viruses: a comparison of strains from mumps cases with and without neurological symptoms[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(4): e61791.
    [9] GOUMA S, VERMEIRE T, van GUCHT S, MARTENS L, HUTSE V, CREMER J, ROTA PA, LEROUX-ROELS G, KOOPMANS M, van BINNENDIJK R, VANDERMARLIERE E. Differences in antigenic sites and other functional regions between genotype A and G mumps virus surface proteins[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8: 13337.
    [10] 傅传喜, 聂军. S79株腮腺炎减毒活疫苗人群血清阳转研究系统评价[J]. 循证医学, 2010, 10(1): 35-38.FU CX, NIE J. Systematic review on live attenuated S79 mumps vaccine seroconversion studies among population[J]. The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2010, 10(1): 35-38 (in Chinese).
    [11] SAITO H, TAKAHASHI Y, HARATA S, TANAKA K, SANO T, SUTO T, YAMADA A, YAMAZAKI S, MORITA M. Isolation and characterization of mumps virus strains in a mumps outbreak with a high incidence of aseptic meningitis[J]. Microbiology and Immunology, 1996, 40(4): 271-275.
    [12] FROST JR, SHAIKH S, SEVERINI A. Exploring the mumps virus glycoproteins: a review[J]. Viruses, 2022, 14(6): 1335.
    [13] CHAMBERS P, RIMA BK, DUPREX WP. Molecular differences between two Jeryl Lynn mumps virus vaccine component strains, JL5 and JL2[J]. Journal of General Virology, 2009, 90(Pt 12): 2973-2981.
    [14] FU XF, GE MJ, XU WC, YU M, JU JG, ZHONG YH, HUANG HQ. Epidemiological features and sociodemographic factors associated with mumps in China’s mainland from 2004 to 2018[J]. Journal of Medical Virology, 2022, 94(10): 4850-4859.
    [15] 陆祖添, 苏永健, 李嘉铃, 张家玮, 赵文文, 李海. 2004-2018年我国流行性腮腺炎发病及死亡情况[J]. 广西医学, 2022, 44(17): 2017-2025.LU ZT, SU YJ, LI JL, ZHANG JW, ZHAO WW, LI H. Morbidity and mortality of epidemic parotitis in China from 2004 to 2018[J]. Guangxi Medical Journal, 2022, 44(17): 2017-2025 (in Chinese).
    [16] 王艳, 马艳, 韩悦, 郭军巧. 辽宁省2008—2011年流行性腮腺炎野病毒SH蛋白基因特征分析[J]. 病毒学报, 2012, 28(5): 506-510.WANG Y, MA Y, HAN Y, GUO JQ. SH protein genetic characterization analysis of wild-type mumps virus isolated in Liaoning Province from 2008 to 2011[J]. Chinese Journal of Virology, 2012, 28(5): 506-510 (in Chinese).
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

钱盈,景淑军,郑国君,杨扬,弓晓杰,李中玉,李悦,孟凡红,宋俐霏. 大连地区腮腺炎病毒G基因型全基因组特征[J]. 微生物学报, 2025, 65(3): 1283-1300

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-13
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-03-10
文章二维码