科微学术

微生物学通报

16S rRNA基因高变区V4和V3−V4及测序深度对油藏细菌菌群分析的影响
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(31500414);国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(201710446078)


Influence of 16S rRNA gene V4 and V3−V4 sequencing and sequencing depth on unraveling bacterial communities inhabiting oil reservoirs
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【背景】16S rRNA基因测序是当前研究微生物群落组成及其分布的重要手段。【目的】揭示16S rRNA基因高变区V4 (515?806)和V3?V4 (338?806)及测序深度(1?2万条和10万条)对油藏微生物细菌群落组成和多样性分析的影响。【方法】所用油水样细菌16S rRNA基因拷贝数为(6.51±0.56)×108/L,16S rRNA基因V4区测序使用Illumina MiSeq PE250测序平台,V3?V4区测序使用MiSeq PE300测序平台。【结果】测序深度达到1?2万条时,V4和V3?V4区测序文库覆盖率均达到99.6%以上,且具有较好的可重复性;V4区测序深度为1?2万和10万时,菌群α多样性指数受测序深度影响不显著;与V4区测序相比,同样测序深度(1?2万)下,V3?V4区测序获得的菌群α多样性指数有所降低。V4测序1?2万与10万获得的菌群中几乎未出现显著性差异微生物类群;同样测序深度(1?2万)下,V4与V3?V4测序相比,优势微生物类群Epsilonproteobacteria (51.37%:64.23%)和Deltaproteobacteria (17.96%:11.40%)相对丰度表现出显著差异。【结论】测序深度达到一定水平,增加测序深度会一定程度上影响菌群α多样性指数,对菌群β多样性分析的影响十分有限;同一测序深度下,V4区与V3?V4区测序获得的细菌菌群α多样性指数明显不同,部分优势微生物类群的相对丰度值之间具有显著性差异。鉴于测序读长的提升和测序成本降低,与V4区测序相比,V3?V4区测序在更低的测序深度下文库覆盖率更高,可提供更多用于反映物种亲缘关系的16S rRNA碱基信息,本文认为V3?V4区测序可作为当下菌群分析的首选区域。

    Abstract:

    [Background] 16S rRNA gene sequencing is an important method to investigate microbial communities inhabiting diverse environments. [Objective] This study aimed to reveal the influences of 16S rRNA gene V4 and V3?V4 sequencing with sequencing depth of 10 000?20 000 and 100 000 on analyzing bacterial communities inhabiting oil reservoirs. [Methods] The number of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene copies of the sample used here was (6.51±0.56)×108/L. The bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplicons were sequenced on MiSeq PE250 and PE300 sequencing platforms, respectively. [Results] The Good’s coverage of each sequencing library reached up to 99.6%, when the sequencing depth reached 10 000. The data obtained by V4 and V3?V4 sequencing were repeatable. The α diversity indices of the communities obtained by V4 sequencing with depth of 10 000?20 000 and 100 000 did not show significantly differences. Furthermore, there were few microbial populations that showed significant differences. Compared with the communities obtained by V4 sequencing, lower α diversity indices were observed in the communities obtained by V3?V4 sequencing with a same sequencing depth, and the relative abundances of Epsilonproteobacteria (51.37%:64.23%) and Deltaproteobacteria (17.96%:11.40%) had significant differences. [Conclusion] The results indicated that increasing sequencing depth had a more distinct impact on community α diversity analysis than community β diversity analysis for a given sample, differential α diversity indices and some dominant microbial populations with significantly differential relative abundances were observed between the communities obtained by V4 and V3?V4 sequencing. In view of the increase of sequencing length and lower cost of MiSeq sequencing, higher sequencing coverage and more 16S rRNA bases, V3?V4 sequencing is suggested as the preferred method at the current stage.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘明艳,马嘉晗,李瑜,刘文霞,秦鸿娟,高配科. 16S rRNA基因高变区V4和V3−V4及测序深度对油藏细菌菌群分析的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47(2): 440-449

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-02-11
文章二维码