Effects of lysozyme on in vitro fermentation, methanogenesis and microbial community structure of the rumen
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [34]
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Objective] We studied the effects of lysozyme on in vitro rumen fermentation, methanogenesis and microbial community structure. [Methods] Lysozyme was added to in vitro ruminal cultures at 5 doses: with 0 (L-0, Control), 0.1 mg/100 mL (L-0.1), 1 mg/100 mL (L-1), 10 mg/100 mL (L-10), and 100 mg/100 mL (L-100). Total gas and methane production were measured at different time of incubation. Culture samples were collected at 24 h for analysis of fermentation parameters and functional microbial populations. In addition, samples of L-0, L-1, and L-100 collected at 24 h were also used subjected to metagenomics analysis of bacterial community using Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons. [Results] Compared with control, methane production, ammonia concentration, dry matter digestibility, organic matter digestibility and total volatile fatty acid concentration were not influenced by L-0.1 (P>0.05). Methane production and NH3-N concentration were reduced, and propionate concentration was increased by L-1 (P<0.05), whereas dry matter digestibility, organic matter digestibility or total volatile fatty acid were not affected (P>0.05). Methane production was reduced, and propionate concentration was increased by L-10 and L-100 (P<0.05), but dry matter digestibility and organic matter digestibility were also decreased significantly (P<0.05). The qPCR results showed that total bacteria, fungi and methanogens were significantly reduced by L-100 (P<0.05), but were not influenced (P>0.05) by L-0.1, L-1, or L-10. Principal Component Analysis of the sequencing data showed clear differences in the composition of the ruminal bacterial community between the control and the lysozyme treatments, demonstrating evident impact of the lysozyme addition. The abundance of propionate-producing bacteria (e.g., Selenomonas and Succinivibrio) was increased by lysozyme, resulting in more hydrogen being directed to production of propionate instead of methane. Moreover, the reduced ammonia concentration in L-1 was probably due to the lower abundance of proteolytic bacteria (e.g., Prevotella and Bacteroides) inhibited by lysozyme. [Conclusion] Appropriate lysozyme addition (1 mg/100 mL) can be used to modulate ruminal microbial ecology and reduce methanogenesis and ammoniagenesis by rumen microbiome without adversely affecting feed digestion or fermentation in short-term.s

    Reference
    [1] Callewaert L, Michiels CW. Lysozymes in the animal kingdom. Journal of Biosciences, 2010, 35(1):127-160.
    [2] Humphrey BD, Huang N, Klasing KC. Rice expressing lactoferrin and lysozyme has antibiotic-like properties when fed to chicks. The Journal of Nutrition, 2002, 132(6):1214-1218.
    [3] Oliver WT, Wells JE. Lysozyme as an alternative to antibiotics improves growth performance and small intestinal morphology in nursery pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 2013, 91(7):3129-3136.
    [4] Maga EA, Walker RL, Anderson GB, Murray JD. Consumption of milk from transgenic goats expressing human lysozyme in the mammary gland results in the modulation of intestinal microflora. Transgenic Research, 2006, 15(4):515-519.
    [5] Nyachoti CM, Kiarie E, Bhandari SK, Zhang G, Krause DO. Weaned pig responses to Escherichia coli K88 oral challenge when receiving a lysozyme supplement. Journal of Animal Science, 2012, 90(1):252-260.
    [6] Green BL, McBride BW, Sandals D, Leslie KE, Bagg R, Dick P. The impact of a monensin controlled-release capsule on subclinical ketosis in the transition dairy cow. Journal of Dairy Science, 1999, 82(2):333-342.
    [7] Shen JS, Liu Z, Chen YY, Lv PA, Zhu WY. Effects of nisin on in vitro fermentation, methanogenesis and functional microbial populations of the rumen. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2016, 56(8):1348-1357. (in Chinese)申军士, 刘壮, 陈亚迎, 吕朋安, 朱伟云. 乳酸链球菌素对瘤胃体外发酵、甲烷生成及功能菌群数量的影响. 微生物学报, 2016, 56(8):1348-1357.
    [8] Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, McAllan AB, France J. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1994, 48(3/4):185-197.
    [9] Wang XF, Mao SY, Liu JH, Zhang LL, Cheng YF, Jin W, Zhu WY. Effect of the gynosaponin on methane production and microbe numbers in a fungus-methanogen co-culture. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 2011, 20(2):272-284.
    [10] Yang CJ, Mao SY, Long LM, Zhu WY. Effect of disodium fumarate on microbial abundance, ruminal fermentation and methane emission in goats under different forage:concentrate ratios. Animal, 2012, 6(11):1788-1794.
    [11] Weatherburn MW. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry, 1967, 39(8):971-974.
    [12] Ma YY, Cheng YF, Zhu WY. Different origins and stubbles of alfalfa:evaluation of nutritional value by an in vitro fermentation method. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2014, 26(8):2421-2432. (in Chinese)马艳艳, 成艳芬, 朱伟云. 体外发酵法评价不同产地、不同茬次苜蓿的营养价值. 动物营养学报, 2014, 26(8):2421-2432.
    [13] Bürgmann H, Pesaro M, Widmer F, Zeyer J. A strategy for optimizing quality and quantity of DNA extracted from soil. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2001, 45(1):7-20.
    [14] Zoetendal EG, Akkermans ADL, De Vos WM. Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of 16S rRNA from human fecal samples reveals stable and host-specific communities of active bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1998, 64(10):3854-3859.
    [15] Denman SE, McSweeney CS. Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2006, 58(3):572-582.
    [16] Sylvester JT, Karnati SKR, Yu ZT, Morrison M, Firkins JL. Development of an assay to quantify rumen ciliate protozoal biomass in cows using real-time PCR. The Journal of Nutrition, 2004, 134(12):3378-3384.
    [17] Denman S, Tomkins N, McSweeney C. Quantitation and diversity analysis of ruminal methanogenic populations in response to the antimethanogenic compound bromochloromethane. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2007, 62(3):313-322.
    [18] Devkota S, Wang Y, Musch MW, Leone V, Fehlnerpeach H, Nadimpalli A, Antonopoulos DA, Jabri B, Chang EB. Dietary-fat-induced taurocholic acid promotes pathobiont expansion and colitis in Il10-/- mice. Nature, 2012, 487(7405):104-108.
    [19] Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26(19):2460-2461.
    [20] Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project:improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 2013, 41(D1):D590-D596.
    [21] Menke KH, Steingass H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development, 1988, 28:7-55.
    [22] Koike S, Kobayashi Y. Fibrolytic rumen bacteria:their ecology and functions. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2009, 22(1):131-138.
    [23] Thoetkiattikul H, Mhuantong W, Laothanachareon T, Tangphatsornruang S, Pattarajinda V, Eurwilaichitr L, Champreda V. Comparative analysis of microbial profiles in cow rumen fed with different dietary fiber by tagged 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing. Current Microbiology, 2013, 67(2):130-137.
    [24] Guo YQ, Hu WL, Liu JX. Methanogens and manipulation of methane production in the rumen. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2005, 45(1):145-148. (in Chinese)郭嫣秋, 胡伟莲, 刘建新. 瘤胃甲烷菌及甲烷生成的调控. 微生物学报, 2005, 45(1):145-148.
    [25] Morgavi DP, Forano E, Martin C, Newbold CJ. Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Animal, 2010, 4(7):1024-1036.
    [26] Drake HL, Küsel K, Matthies C. Acetogenic prokaryotes//Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F. The Prokaryotes:Prokaryotic Physiology and Biochemistry. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 2013:3-60.
    [27] Mitsumori M, Sun WB. Control of rumen microbial fermentation for mitigating methane emissions from the rumen. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2008, 21(1):144-154.
    [28] Hillman K, Williams AG, Lloyd D. Postprandial variations in endogenous metabolic activities of ovine rumen ciliate protozoa. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1995, 52(3/4):237-247.
    [29] Pope PB, Smith W, Denman SE, Tringe SG, Barry K, Hugenholtz P, McSweeney CS, McHardy AC, Morrison M. Isolation of Succinivibrionaceae implicated in low methane emissions from Tammar wallabies. Science, 2011, 333(6042):646-648.
    [30] Fraga M, Perelmuter K, Valencia MJ, Martínez M, Abin-Carriquiry A, Cajarville C, Zunino P. Evaluation of native potential probiotic bacteria using an in vitro ruminal fermentation system. Annals of Microbiology, 2014, 64(3):1149-1156.
    [31] Firkins JL, Yu Z, Morrison M. Ruminal nitrogen metabolism:perspectives for integration of microbiology and nutrition for dairy. Journal of Dairy Science, 2007, 90(S):E1-E16.
    [32] Patra AK, Yu ZT. Effects of vanillin, quillaja saponin, and essential oils on in vitro fermentation and protein-degrading microorganisms of the rumen. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 98(2):897-905.
    [33] Wallace RJ. Ruminal microbial metabolism of peptides and amino acids. The Journal of Nutrition, 1996, 126(4S):1326S-1334S.
    [34] Chen G, Russell JB. More monensin-sensitive, ammonia-producing bacteria from the rumen. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1989, 55(5):1052-1057.
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

Yaying Chen, Zhuang Liu, Peng'an Lv, Junshi Shen, Weiyun Zhu. Effects of lysozyme on in vitro fermentation, methanogenesis and microbial community structure of the rumen. [J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2017, 57(5): 758-768

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:December 29,2016
  • Revised:February 22,2017
  • Online: May 02,2017
Article QR Code